Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40801569›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Nanotechnology-Based Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Mohd Ahmar Rauf, Afifa Rao, Siva Sankari Sivasoorian, Arun K Iyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Targeting prostate adenocarcinoma tumor microenvironment via cancer nanotheranostics: a comprehensive update on improved roadmap for disease diagnosis, therapy and management.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohd Ahmar RaufDepartment of Internal Medicine, Heme/Oncology Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-2208
Afifa RaoJamia Hamdard Medical College, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi 110062, India.
Siva Sankari SivasoorianDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Arun K IyerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-0222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-associated protein 9)-mediated genome editing has emerged as a transformative tool in medicine, offering significant potential for cancer therapy because of its capacity to precisely target and alter the genetic modifications associated with the disease. However, a major challenge for its clinical translation is the safe and efficient in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components to target cells. Nanotechnology is a promising solution to this problem. Nanocarriers, owing to their tunable physicochemical properties, can encapsulate and protect CRISPR/Cas9 components, enabling targeted delivery and enhanced cellular uptake. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the synergistic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 and nanotechnology in cancer therapy and explores their integrated therapeutic applications in gene editing and immunotherapy. A critical aspect of in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 application is to achieve effective localization at the tumor site while minimizing off-target effects. Nanocarriers can be engineered to overcome biological barriers, thereby augmenting tumor-specific delivery and facilitating intracellular uptake. Furthermore, their design allows for controlled release of the therapeutic payload, ensuring sustained efficacy and reduced systemic toxicity. The optimization of nanocarrier attributes, including size, shape, surface charge, and composition, is crucial for improving the cellular internalization, endosomal escape, and nuclear localization of CRISPR/Cas9. Moreover, surface functionalization with targeting ligands can enhance the specificity of cancer cells, leading to improved gene-editing accuracy. This review thoroughly discusses the challenges associated with in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 delivery and the innovative nanotechnological strategies employed to overcome them, highlighting their combined potential for advancing cancer treatment for clinical application.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesNanotechnologyNeoplasmsAnimalsGene EditingGenetic TherapyHumansCRISPR/Cas9gene editingnanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID40801569
PMCPMC12346122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.