Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40801475›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

A Framework for Generating Realistic Synthetic Tabular Data in a Randomized Controlled Trial Setting.

Niki Z Petrakos, Erica E M Moodie, Nicolas Savy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Niki Z PetrakosDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5606-0449
Erica E M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7225-3977
Nicolas SavyInstitut de Mathématiques de Toulouse; UMR5219, Université de Toulouse; CNRS, UT2J, Toulouse, France.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generation of realistic synthetic data has garnered considerable attention in recent years, particularly in the health research domain due to its utility in, for instance, sharing data while protecting patient privacy or determining optimal clinical trial design. While much work has been concentrated on synthetic image generation, generation of realistic and complex synthetic tabular data of the type most commonly encountered in classic epidemiological or clinical studies is still lacking, especially with regard to generating data for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There is no consensus regarding the best way to generate synthetic tabular RCT data such that the underlying multivariate data distribution is preserved. Motivated by an RCT in the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus, we empirically compared the ability of several strategies and three generation techniques (two machine learning, the other a more classical statistical method) to faithfully reproduce realistic data. Our results suggest that using a sequential generation approach with an R-vine copula model to generate baseline variables, followed by a simple random treatment allocation to mimic the RCT setting, and subsequent regression models for variables post-treatment allocation (such as the trial outcome) is the most effective way to generate synthetic tabular RCT data that capture important and realistic features of the real data.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansMachine LearningModels, StatisticalAnti-HIV AgentsAdversarial Random Forestcopuladata generationGenerative Adversarial Networkrandomized controlled trialssynthetic datatabular data

Identifiers

PMID40801475
PMCPMC12345405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.