Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40801427›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Representation of Pain and Injury in Children's Picture Books-A Content Analysis.

Dur-E-Nayab Mehar, Sue Nichols, Abbie Jordan, G Lorimer Moseley, Melanie Noel, Sarah B Wallwork

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dur-E-Nayab MeharIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Sue NicholsEducation Futures, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Abbie JordanCentre for Pain Research & Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
G Lorimer MoseleyIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Melanie NoelDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sarah B WallworkIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain and injury experiences are common throughout childhood (e.g., minor injuries, vaccine injections) and provide important and frequent opportunities for children to learn about pain. Sociocultural contexts, such as reading picture books, may also provide critical opportunities for children to learn about pain/injury. This study aimed to investigate the representation of pain and injury in children's literature.

methodsWe systematically screened for pain/injury representations in children's picture books, freely available from public libraries in South Australia. A content analysis of pain/injury representations was conducted on all included books.

resultsTwo hundred and fifty-four picture books were screened until 50 books with pain/injury representations were identified. There were 63 pain (i.e., subjective experience) and 43 injury (i.e., associated with tissue damage) representations. 'Minor' pains/injuries were frequently represented (n = 69; 86%), whereas 'procedural' (e.g., vaccine injections) (n = 1; 1%) and 'chronic' pain (n = 2; 3%) were not. Gender differences were observed where boy characters experienced more pain/injury incidents (n = 42; 53%) than girl characters (n = 23; 28.8%). Behavioural responses to pain/injury also differed, with girl characters being portrayed to experience more emotional responses (e.g., crying; n = 7; 77.8%) than boy characters (n = 2; 22.2%). Other characters present during pain/injury experiences were more likely to be passive bystanders (i.e., did not respond; n = 109; 59.6%) than active responders (n = 51; 27.6%) to characters experiencing pain.

conclusionsWhile the type of pain/injury representations in picture books seem consistent with young children's everyday pain/injury experiences (i.e., 'minor' pains/injuries), gendered stereotypes and dominant societal perspectives around pain and injury appear to be reinforced. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Shared reading of children's picture books provides an important sociocultural context for children to learn about pain and injury. In this study, we investigated how pain and injury are represented in children's picture books. We found that pain/injury incidents were consistent with young children's common pain/injury experiences; however, observing characters often lacked prosocial behaviours (e.g., helping, providing comfort) and gendered stereotypes were common. These findings have similarities to pain representations in children's popular TV/movies, speaking to the pervasiveness of these messages across children's media.

Indexed as

BooksPainWounds and InjuriesChildFemaleHumansMaleReadingchild educationchildren's picture bookspaediatric painpainsociocultural context

Identifiers

PMID40801427
PMCPMC12345404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.