ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2026
Barriers and accessibility-improving strategies in mental health services for persons with hearing or vision impairments: Perspectives from professionals and clients-A qualitative interview study.
Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and accessibility-improving strategies in mental health services for persons with hearing or vision impairments: Perspectives from professionals and clients-A qualitative interview study.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2026Article
- Psychotherapists' Perspectives and Support Needs in Treating Patients With Disabilities: Results From an Online Survey.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDespite studies showing that persons with hearing impairments (HI) or vision impairments (VI) have an increased risk of developing mental health disorders, mental health services frequently are not accessible and suited to the specific needs of both populations. However, there is limited research addressing how mental health services can be improved to meet these needs.
designThis qualitative interview study explores barriers and strategies to improve accessibility in mental health services for persons with HI or VI in Germany, as viewed with a multi-perspective approach.
methodsUsing problem-centred interviews, which combine a flexible interview guide with a focus on specific issues, we applied a participatory research approach to gather insights from 58 participants, including mental health professionals specialised in treating persons with HI or VI and persons with HI or VI with lived experience as clients in mental health services.
resultsThe qualitative content analysis yielded 44 inductive subcategories within a category system of seven deductive main categories. Key barriers included communication, limited visual accessibility and environmental challenges, while improvement strategies focused on tailored therapeutic adaptations as well as proactive and collaborative practices between therapists and clients.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the need for structural changes and expanded mental health services that cater to the specific needs of persons with sensory impairments. These insights should contribute to improving mental health services, training programs for professionals and emphasise the importance of including persons with HI or VI, both professionals and clients, in the participatory development of accessible care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.