ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
An evaluation of macrosomia risk factors in a cohort of Chinese women and neonates.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Pregnancy BMI and Gestational Weight Gain Have Independent Associations with Birth Weight: A Prospective Cohort Study in Mongolia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing the risk factors and establishing multivariable prediction models for singleton macrosomia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveWe aimed to identify risk factors for macrosomia in women with high-risk pregnancies, which will allow for early identification and timely intervention and improve the health of mothers and infants.MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted of pregnant women and neonates born at Shenmu Hospital in China between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2023. Cases comprised neonates with macrosomia (birth weight ≥4000 g), and controls comprised a group of normal-weight neonates (birth weight 2500-3999 g). Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictor variables.ResultsIn total, 10,253 cases with complete maternal and neonatal-related data were included in this study, with 1100 cases in the macrosomia group and 9153 in the control group. Male neonates (odds ratio = 1.636), gestational age (odds ratio = 1.726), maternal height ≥165 cm (odds ratio = 3.648), prepregnancy body mass index ≥28 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.