Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40801222›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Assessing the Quality of the Endocervical Component: Pitfalls to Cervical Cancer Screening in Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Dorah Ursula Ramathuba, Doris Ngambi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dorah Ursula RamathubaDepartment of Advanced Nursing Science, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7571-4767
Doris NgambiDepartment of Advanced Nursing Science, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundSpecimen adequacy is an essential indicator of screening programme performance. The effectiveness and efficiency of Pap tests are classified in the laboratory based on their adequacy for interpretation as satisfactory or unsatisfactory.PurposeThe purpose of the study was to determine the processes of collecting, storing, transporting, and evaluating Pap smears in rural health facilities in Limpopo Province, South Africa.MethodA mixed-method research approach was used for the study. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed to collect and analyse qualitative data, and then use the findings to develop an instrument in a subsequent quantitative phase, thereby increasing the breadth and depth of understanding of the phenomena under study. The population comprised professional nurses, operational managers, and laboratory technicians. The qualitative strand explored challenges to cervical cancer screening, while the quantitative strand described factors contributing to the inadequacy of the cervical component. The study was conducted from July 2019 to February 2020. The results were merged for triangulation.FindingsThe inadequacy rates reported by districts ranged between 38% and 50%. The findings revealed that professional nurses lacked adequate knowledge of the skills required for collecting, labelling, and storing Pap smears before dispatch. Furthermore, the in-service training provided was poorly coordinated and unstructured, and other professional nurses were not keen on screening for cervical cancer, resulting in poor health outcomes for women in the community who had to return for repeat smears.ConclusionInadequacy of the transformation zone component and unsatisfactory smears have a higher risk of progression to cervical cancer or pre-cancer lesion than adequacy of the transformation zone.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapanicolaou TestUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsAdultFemaleHumansSouth Africaassessmentcervical cancercervixPap smearspecimen adequacy

Identifiers

PMID40801222
PMCPMC12351071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.