ArticleCancer biology & therapy2025
Establishing a pediatric solid tumor PDX biobank for precision oncology research.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ITCC-P4 PDX Platform Enables Preclinical Testing of Pediatric Cancers.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Ex vivo drug sensitivity profiling to complement molecular profiling in pediatric precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing advanced preclinical models and targeted therapies is essential for reducing cancer-related deaths in children with solid tumors. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) have the potential to replicate key elements of the original tumor, including morphology, genetic alterations, and microenvironment, making them valuable tools for studying tumor biology and drug response. We implanted 124 pediatric solid tumor samples, collected for 1 y, into NOD/SCID/IL2Rg (NSG) mice. Tumor fragments were placed subcutaneously, and the animals were monitored for up to 1 y. Histopathology, Short Tandem Repeat (STR) profiling, RT-PCR and/or RNA-sequencing were performed to confirm tumor identity and detect driver fusions. Fifty-five xenografts were successfully established (44.35% of implanted samples), representing 19 tumor types. Sarcomas, notably osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, displayed first-generation engraftment rates above 55%. Central nervous system tumors had lower success, reflecting unique microenvironmental requirements. Histopathology and STR concordances were 85.45% and 81.1%, respectively, while 92.6% of sarcoma PDXs retained original fusion genes. Second-generation xenografts showed faster growth, suggesting adaptation to the murine host. Sporadic discrepancies, such as new fusions or lymphoproliferative expansions, indicated the need for ongoing molecular validation parallel to other techniques. A pediatric PDX biobank can effectively capture key tumor features while facilitating the study of therapeutic responses and tumor evolution. Our models confirm the feasibility of achieving stable histological and molecular profiles, offering a valuable resource for precision oncology research. Ultimately, these pediatric PDXs could accelerate the discovery of targeted therapy and significantly improve treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.