Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40801126›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Integrating Positive Schemas in Schema Therapy for Cluster C Personality Disorders in Older Adults: A Multiple Baseline Study.

Loes van Donzel, Machteld A Ouwens, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Samantha Bouwmeester, Nathan Bachrach, Arjan C Videler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Positive Constructs in Schema Therapy: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical psychology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Loes van DonzelPersonaCura, Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality Disorders and Developmental Disorders in Older Adults, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1778-9637
Machteld A OuwensPersonaCura, Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality Disorders and Developmental Disorders in Older Adults, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-7464
Sebastiaan P J van AlphenDepartment of Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-3349
Samantha BouwmeesterTSB: Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1771-0546
Nathan BachrachTSB: Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-2692
Arjan C VidelerPersonaCura, Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality Disorders and Developmental Disorders in Older Adults, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-3453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schema therapy (ST) is an effective psychotherapy for personality disorders in (older) adults. There is an increasing awareness of the imbalance in the ST community because of the emphasis on negative schemas versus attention to positive schemas. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted ST approach that integrates positive schemas. Using a multiple baseline design, the study assessed 10 older adults (aged > 60) with Cluster C personality disorders through 1 year of weekly individual ST sessions, followed by a 6-month follow-up. Baseline consisted of 4-8 weeks without intervention. Primary outcomes were credibility of positive and negative core beliefs; secondary measures examined symptomatic distress, schema modes, early maladaptive and positive schemas. Results showed mixed individual outcomes. Positive core beliefs significantly improved in 38% of participants during treatment and 50% at follow-up, whereas negative core beliefs decreased significantly for 25% of participants during treatment and 67% at follow-up. At the group level, significant increases with very large effect sizes were observed in positive core beliefs in baseline versus follow-up and reductions in negative beliefs in baseline versus treatment and versus follow-up. Secondary outcomes revealed significant reductions in symptomatic distress and PD criteria, alongside increased positive schemas. No significant changes were found for schema modes or maladaptive schemas. This first study underscores the potential of integrating positive schemas into ST for older adults, suggesting preliminary efficacy. Further research is essential to generalize findings across different age groups and diagnoses and to identify which aspects of positive schemas enhance therapy outcomes.

Indexed as

Personality DisordersPsychotherapyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeearly adaptive schemaolder adultspersonality disorderspositive schemaschema therapy

Identifiers

PMID40801126
PMCPMC12344752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.