ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025
Comparative Decay Dynamics and Detectability of eDNA and eRNA in Connected and Isolated Freshwater Mesocosms Using Digital PCR.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing Practical and Cost-Effective Methodologies for Preservation and Extraction of Environmental RNA (eRNA) From Aquatic Samples.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Biomonitoring 3.0: Beyond Taxa Lists to Evidence-Tiered Monitoring of Ecosystem Dynamics and Interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Review
- Environmental RNA reflects seasonal changes in the metabolic activity of stream salamanders.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient use of environmental nucleic acids (eNAs) in freshwater biodiversity monitoring requires understanding their degradation and detectability in interconnected ecosystems. We employed a novel field-scale assay to compare environmental DNA (eDNA) and environmental RNA (eRNA) decay rates and detectability across four genetic markers (16S, 18S, COI and LDHA) in connected and isolated 1000-L mesocosms containing natural planktonic assemblages. This design provides ecologically relevant and complex settings to assess how connectivity influences the detectability of eNA over time. Isolated and head mesocosms were spiked with eNAs from cultured Daphnia pulex, absent from the water source, while downstream mesocosms received eNAs via unidirectional water transfers. Using digital PCR (dPCR), we captured fine-scale temporal patterns across mitochondrial and nuclear markers and transcript types (mRNA and rRNA), an approach rarely combined in previous research. eRNA degraded significantly faster than eDNA across markers and mesocosm types. Among RNA types, mRNA (COI, LDHA) degraded faster than rRNA (16S, 18S). eRNA followed a uniform monophasic decay pattern, whereas eDNA displayed biphasic decay for nuclear markers and monophasic decay for mitochondrial markers. eNA decay rates in this field-relevant mesocosm network exceeded those from laboratory scale. While decay rates remained consistent across networks, detectability declined with dilution. Even after a 10,000-fold dilution, both eNAs were detected in terminal mesocosms, demonstrating effective transport across the network. Although RNA degrades rapidly, high detectability was achieved across diverse dilutions using dPCR, highlighting eRNA's potential for detecting active biological communities in freshwater systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.