ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Conducting Polymer Coatings for Bioelectronic Arthroscopy Probes.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microsphere-Templated Conductive Syntactic Foams for Recyclable and Additively Manufactured Soft Electronics.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Conducting Polymer Coatings for Bioelectronic Arthroscopy Probes.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents conducting polymer coatings as an effective strategy to enhance the performance of electromechanical arthroscopy probes by significantly reducing electrical equilibration time (the period a surgeon must wait for the probe signal to stabilize before measurement) and improving signal stability. Microelectrodes coated with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene, PEDOT) reach electrical equilibrium in physiological medium within 10 s, compared to over 2 min for standard electroless nickel immersion gold-based (ENIG) probes and ≈20 s for electrodeposited gold, thereby eliminating impractical delays during arthroscopic procedures. PEDOT coatings also reduce impedance by two to three orders of magnitude at low frequencies (<1 kHz), minimizing sensitivity to hand motion and reducing the likelihood of repeated measurements. Importantly, these electrodes maintain their functionality after sterilization and repeated use, demonstrating high reliability for intraoperative applications. Furthermore, PEDOT-coated nickel-phosphorus (Ni-P) microelectrodes offer a gold-free, cost-effective, and sustainable alternative. As osteoarthritis continues to affect a growing global population, the development of rapid, durable, and accessible diagnostic tools is increasingly critical. The integration of PEDOT into arthroscopic microelectrodes represents a clinically promising approach to faster, more efficient cartilage assessment while reducing reliance on critical raw materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.