Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800995›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Weak and unstable prediction of personality from the structural connectome.

Amelie Rauland, Kyesam Jung, Theodore D Satterthwaite, Matthew Cieslak, Kathrin Reetz, Simon B Eickhoff, Oleksandr V Popovych

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amelie RaulandDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Kyesam JungInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Theodore D SatterthwaiteLifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Matthew CieslakLifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Kathrin ReetzDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Oleksandr V PopovychInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personality neuroscience aims to discover links between personality traits and features of the brain. Previous neuroimaging studies have investigated the connection between the brain structure, microstructural properties of brain tissue, or the functional connectivity (FC) and these personality traits. Analyses relating personality to diffusion-weighted MRI measures were limited to investigating the voxel-wise or tract-wise association of microstructural properties with trait scores. The main goal of our study was to determine whether there is an individual predictive relationship between the structural connectome (SC) and the big five personality traits. To that end, we expanded past work in two ways: First, by focusing on the entire structural connectome (SC) instead of separate voxels and tracts; and second, by predicting personality trait scores instead of performing a statistical correlation analysis to assess an out-of-sample performance. Prediction of personality from the SC is, however, not yet as established as prediction of behavior from the FC, and sparse studies in this field so far delivered rather heterogeneous results. We, therefore, further dedicated our study to investigate whether and how different pipeline settings influence prediction performance. In a sample of 426 unrelated subjects with high-quality MRI acquisitions from the Human Connectome Project, we analyzed 19 different brain parcellations, 3 SC weightings, 3 groups of subjects, and 4 feature classes for the prediction of the 5 personality traits using a ridge regression. From the large number of evaluated pipelines, only very few lead to promising results of prediction accuracy

Indexed as

big five personality traitscognitiondiffusion-weighted MRIindividual differencesmachine learning prediction analysisstructural connectome

Identifiers

PMID40800995
PMCPMC12319827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.