ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Longitudinal reproducibility of brain and spinal cord quantitative MRI biomarkers.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Review of the Reliability and Reproducibility of Magnetisation Transfer Imaging in Human Cervical Spinal Cord.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Distinct Physiological Mechanisms Drive Grey Matter Plasticity in Complex Versus Simple Sequence Learning.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Reproducibility and Reliability of Free-Water-Corrected Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain: Revisited.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- CNeuroMod-THINGS, a densely-sampled fMRI dataset for visual neuroscience.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Precision neurodiversity: personalized brain network architecture as a window into cognitive variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord nerve rootlets.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Gamer in the scanner: Event-related analysis of fMRI activity during retro videogame play guided by automated annotations of game content.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative MRI (qMRI) promises better specificity, accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility relative to its clinically-used qualitative MRI counterpart. Longitudinal reproducibility is particularly important in qMRI. The goal is to reliably quantify tissue properties that may be assessed in longitudinal clinical studies throughout disease progression or during treatment. In this work, we present the initial data release of the quantitative MRI portion of the Courtois project on neural modelling (CNeuroMod), where the brain and cervical spinal cord of six participants were scanned at regular intervals over the course of several years. This first release includes 3 years of data collection and up to 10 sessions per participant using quantitative MRI imaging protocols (T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.