Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800992›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

The impact of localization and registration accuracy on estimates of deep brain stimulation electrode position in stereotactic space.

Mohamad Abbass, Alaa Taha, Greydon Gilmore, Brendan Santyr, Alan Chalil, Mandar Jog, Keith MacDougall, Andrew G Parrent, Terry M Peters, Jonathan C Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamad AbbassDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-2696
Alaa TahaImaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Canada.
Greydon GilmoreDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7523-5734
Brendan SantyrDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Alan ChalilDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Mandar JogDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Keith MacDougallDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Andrew G ParrentDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Terry M PetersDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-7488
Jonathan C LauDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8452-8915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) depend on millimetric accuracy and are commonly studied across populations by registering patient scans to a stereotactic space. Multiple factors contribute to estimates of electrode position, but the millimetric contributions of these factors remain poorly quantified. We previously validated 32 anatomical fiducials (AFIDs) to measure AFID registration error (AFRE), which can capture focal misregistration not observed using volume-based methods. To this end, we used the AFIDs framework to examine the effects of misregistration on electrode position in stereotactic space, leveraging a retrospective series of patients who underwent subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Raters independently localized DBS electrodes and AFIDs on patient scans, which were non-linearly registered to a common stereotactic (MNI) space. AFIDs provided intuitive measures of registration accuracy, with AFREs ranging from 1.49 mm to 6.85 mm across brain regions. Subcortical AFIDs in proximity to the DBS target (STN) had AFREs that spatially covaried, suggesting consistent spatial patterns of misregistration to stereotactic space. These identified spatial patterns account for 28% of the variance in electrode position along the axis of maximum variance, corresponding to a median of 0.64 mm (range of 0.05 to 2.05 mm). The AFIDs framework provides millimetric estimates of registration accuracy in DBS, while allowing the uncoupling of registration-related factors from other sources of variance in electrode position. Furthermore, they can be employed for estimating registration-related variance in population studies, for quality control, and to provide a basis for comparison as well as optimization of registration parameters and software.

Indexed as

accuracydeep brain stimulationlocalizationregistrationstereotaxy

Identifiers

PMID40800992
PMCPMC12319956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.