ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Linking microscopy to diffusion MRI with degenerate biophysical models: An application of the Bayesian EstimatioN of CHange (BENCH) framework.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biophysical modelling of diffusion MRI (dMRI) is used to non-invasively estimate microstructural features of tissue, particularly in the brain. However, meaningful description of tissue requires many unknown parameters, resulting in a model that is often ill-posed. The Bayesian EstimatioN of CHange (BENCH) framework was specifically designed to circumvent parameter fitting for ill-conditioned models when one is simply interested in interpreting signal changes related to some variable of interest. To understand the biological underpinning of some observed change in MR signal between different conditions, BENCH predicts which model parameter, or combination of parameters, best explains the observed change, without having to invert the model. BENCH has been previously used to identify which biophysical parameters could explain group-wise dMRI signal differences (e.g., patients vs. controls); here, we adapt BENCH to interpret dMRI signal changes related to continuous variables. We investigate how parameters from the dMRI standard model of white matter, with an additional sphere compartment to represent glial cell bodies, relate to tissue microstructure quantified from histology. We validate BENCH using synthetic dMRI data from numerical simulations. We then apply it to ex-vivo macaque brain data with dMRI and microscopy metrics of glial density, axonal density, and axonal dispersion in the same brain. We found that (i) increases in myelin density are primarily associated with an increased intra-axonal volume fraction and (ii) changes in the orientation dispersion derived from myelin microscopy are linked to variations in the orientation dispersion index. Finally, we found that the dMRI signal is sensitive to changes in glial cell load in the brain white matter, though no single parameter in the extended standard model was able to explain this observed signal change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.