ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Interhemispheric integration in the neural face perception network: Does stimulus location matter?
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal mechanisms of individual differences in hemispheric lateralization of the face perception network: A DCM-PEB approach.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neural mechanisms underlying hemispheric lateralization can be investigated using neuroimaging methods and modelling techniques. In some experiments, sensory information is initially presented exclusively to one hemisphere, for example, by displaying a visual stimulus in the periphery of the contralateral hemifield. This experimental design enables, among other things, a comparison of competing theories of interhemispheric integration (e.g., interhemispheric inhibition vs. interhemispheric recruitment). However, the underlying neural models for peripheral stimulation may differ from those for central stimulation and, therefore, may not adequately describe the mechanisms associated with typical, foveal stimulus processing. To address this question, the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study analysed the influence of stimulus location (peripheral vs. central) on neural network connectivity, particularly interhemispheric transfer, as determined by dynamic causal modelling (DCM), for a face perception task. Face and object images were presented either peripherally or centrally to a group of healthy volunteers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.