Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800970›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Generation of surrogate brain maps preserving spatial autocorrelation through random rotation of geometric eigenmodes.

Nikitas C Koussis, James C Pang, Richa Phogat, Jayson Jeganathan, Bryan Paton, Alex Fornito, P A Robinson, Bratislav Misic, Michael Breakspear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Geometric influences on the regional organization of the mammalian brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. The effect of spherical projection on spin tests for brain maps.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikitas C KoussisNeuromodulation Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-3223
James C PangSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2760
Richa PhogatNeuromodulation Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-9112
Jayson JeganathanNeuromodulation Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4175-918X
Bryan PatonNeuromodulation Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-5001
Alex FornitoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-480X
P A RobinsonSchool of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-6049
Bratislav MisicNetwork Neuroscience Lab, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-2862
Michael BreakspearNeuromodulation Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4943-3969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain expresses activity in complex spatiotemporal patterns, reflecting the influence of spatially distributed cytoarchitectural, biochemical, and genetic properties. The correspondence between these different "brain maps" is a topic of substantial interest. However, these maps possess intrinsic smoothness (spatial autocorrelation, SA) which can inflate spurious cross-correlations, leading to false positive associations. Identifying true associations requires knowledge about the distribution of correlations that arise by chance in the presence of SA. This null distribution can be generated from an ensemble of surrogate brain maps that preserve the intrinsic SA but break the correlations between maps. The present work introduces the "eigenstrapping" method, which performs a spectral decomposition of brain maps, such as fMRI activation patterns, expressed on cortical and subcortical surfaces, using geometric eigenmodes, and then randomly rotating these modes to produce SA-preserving surrogate brain maps. It is shown that these surrogates appropriately represent the null distribution of chance pairwise correlations, with expected false positive control superior to current state-of-the-art procedures. Eigenstrapping is fast, eschews the need for parametric assumptions about the nature of a map's SA, and works with maps defined on smooth surfaces with a boundary, such as a single cortical hemisphere when the medial wall has been removed. Moreover, eigenstrapping generalizes to broader classes of null models than existing techniques, offering a unified approach for inference on cortical and subcortical maps, spatiotemporal processes, and complex patterns possessing higher-order correlations.

Indexed as

cortical and subcortical mappingmethodsnon-parametric inferencesoftware and analysisstatistical brain mapping

Identifiers

PMID40800970
PMCPMC12330862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.