ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Simultaneous and synchronous characterization of blood and CSF flow dynamics using multiple Venc PC MRI.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flow 2.0: A Standardized Toolbox for Real-Time Phase-Contrast MRI of Neurofluid Dynamics.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Assessment of Intracranial Artery and Paravascular CSF Pulsation Using 3D Whole-Brain Diffusion-Prepared Cine bSSFP (DECAF) MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Pulsatility Assessment of Cerebral Perforating Arteries Using Submillimeter-Resolution Dual-VENC Phase-Contrast MRI at 3T.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Simultaneous real-time imaging of upper cervical cerebrospinal fluid and vascular dynamics using ultrafast inflow-weighted EPI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Imaging blood to periarterial CSF flow coupling using 4D flow MRI and an ultra-high-performance head-only gradient system.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of low-frequency oscillations using real-time phase-contrast MRI during drowsiness.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Synchronous quantification of arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics using real-time phase-contrast MRI.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- DrSVision: A Machine Learning Tool for Cortical Region-Specific fNIRS Calibration Based on Cadaveric Head MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurofluid dynamics are crucial for maintaining brain homeostasis and facilitating the clearance of brain metabolites through the coupling of arterial and venous blood with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Two-dimensional phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used to study neurofluids; however, separate examinations are typically required for assessing blood and CSF flow, which can confound analyses due to asynchronous physiological measurements. To enable simultaneous assessment of neurofluid dynamics, we describe and evaluate a 2D PC MRI approach in human participant experiments. An interleaved multi-point velocity encoding scheme was integrated into a 2D golden angle spiral PC MRI scan to facilitate synchronous characterization of neurofluids. Two multi-point schemes, including interleaved dual-venc (DV) and triple-venc (MV) scans, were evaluated and compared with standard asynchronous single-venc (SV) scans. Data and repeated scans were collected on a clinical 3.0T scanner at the level of the C1/C2 vertebrae in 10 human participants. From cardiac-resolved images, the relationship between net blood flow and CSF flow pulsatile volume change was characterized using regression modeling. Temporal lags between cardiac-driven arterial blood (vertebral arteries (VAs) and internal carotid arteries (ICAs)) and spinal canal (SC) CSF were estimated with cross-correlation. SV, DV, and MV flow mean, range, and volume changes were studied and compared using linear mixed effect models, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman, and Pearson correlations. A strong relationship was measured between net blood flow and CSF flow pulsatile volume change from SV (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.