ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Identifying dynamic reproducible brain states using a predictive modelling approach.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connectome-based substrates of emotional N-back performance in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Connectome-based prediction of problematic use of social media in adolescents: Findings from the ABCD study.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Cognition emerges from phase dynamics of intrinsic coordination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.Nature. Mental health · 2026Article
- Dynamic brain mechanisms supporting salient memories under cortisol.Science advances · 2025Article
- An EEG-network-metric based approach to real-time trust inference in human-autonomy teaming.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2025Article
- Temporal variability of brain-behavior relationships in fine-scale dynamics of edge time series.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conceptually, brain states reflect some combination of the internal mental processes of a person, and the influence of their external environment. Importantly, for neuroimaging, brain states may impact brain-based modeling of a person's traits, which should be independent of moment-to-moment changes in behavior. Investigation of brain states, and modeling of traits or behaviors are both often done using fMRI-based functional connectivity. Brain states can fluctuate in time periods shorter than a typical fMRI scan, and an array of methods called dynamic functional connectivity analyses has been developed to measure them. It has previously been shown that brain state can be manipulated through the use of continuous performance tasks that put the brain in a particular configuration while the task is performed. Here, we focus on moment-to-moment changes in brain state and test the hypothesis that there are particular brain-states that maximize brain-trait modeling performance. We use a regression-based framework, Connectome-based Predictive Modelling, allied to a resample aggregating approach, to identify behavior and trait-related brain states, as represented by dynamic functional connectivity maps. We find that there is not a particular brain state that is optimal for trait-based prediction, and combining data from distinct brain states across the scan is better. We also find that this is not the case for in-scanner behavioral prediction where more isolated and temporally specific parts of the scan session are better for building predictive models of behavior. The resample aggregated dynamic functional connectivity models of behavior replicated in sample using unseen left-out data. The modeling framework also showed success in estimating variance in behavior in a separate dataset. The method detailed here may prove useful for both the study of behaviorally related brain states, and for short-time predictive modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.