Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800939›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Modeling neural contrast sensitivity functions in human visual cortex.

Carlien Roelofzen, Marcus Daghlian, Jelle A van Dijk, Maartje C de Jong, Serge O Dumoulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Visual adaptation stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian: Linking performance with V1 cortical surface area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlien RoelofzenSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marcus DaghlianSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jelle A van DijkSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maartje C de JongSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Serge O DumoulinSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) characterizes visual function, and iswidely used in research on visual perception and ophthalmological disorders. TheCSF describes the lowest contrast level that participants can perceive as afunction of spatial frequency. Here, we present a new method to estimate theneural equivalent of the CSF that describes how a population of neurons respondsto contrast as a function of spatial frequency. Using functional magneticresonance imaging (fMRI) at 7 Tesla, we measured neural responses whileparticipants viewed gratings that varied systematically in contrast and spatialfrequency. We modeled the neural CSF (nCSF) using an asymmetric parabolicfunction, and we modeled the transition from no response to full response usinga contrast response function (CRF). We estimated the nCSF parameters for everycortical location by minimizing the residual variance between the modelpredictions and the fMRI data. We validated the method using simulations andparameter recovery. We show that our nCSF model explains a significant amount ofthe variance in the fMRI time series. Moreover, the properties of the nCSF varyaccording to known systematic differences across the visual cortex.Specifically, the peak spatial frequency that a cortical location responds todecreases with eccentricity and across the visual hierarchy. This new methodwill provide valuable insights into the properties of the visual cortex and howthey are altered in both healthy and clinical conditions.

Indexed as

contrast response functioncontrast sensitivity functionfMRIspatial frequencyvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID40800939
PMCPMC12319964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.