ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
An fMRI study of initiation and inhibition of manual and spoken responses in people who stutter.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced integrity in the frontal aslant tract's premotor connections is associated with dysfluency severity in stuttering.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Unraveling the mystery of stuttering: clinical and physiological insights into its manifestation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Verbal Response Inhibition in Adults Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Why Stuttering Occurs: The Role of Cognitive Conflict and Control.Topics in language disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stuttering is characterised by difficulties initiating speech and frequent interruptions to the flow of speech. Neuroimaging studies of speech production in people who stutter consistently reveal greater activity of the right inferior frontal cortex, an area robustly implicated in stopping manual and spoken responses. This has been linked to an "overactive response suppression mechanism" in people who stutter. Here, we used fMRI to investigate neural differences related to response initiation and inhibition in people who stutter and matched controls (aged 19-45) during performance of the stop-signal task in both the manual and speech domains. We hypothesised there would be increased activity in an inhibitory network centred on the right inferior frontal cortex. Out-of-scanner behavioural testing revealed that people who stutter were slower than controls to respond to 'go' stimuli in both the manual and the speech domains, but the groups did not differ in their stop-signal reaction times in either domain. During the fMRI task, both groups activated the expected networks for the manual and speech tasks. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not observe differences in task-evoked activity between people who stutter and controls during either 'go' or 'stop' trials. Targeted region-of-interest analyses in the inferior frontal cortex, the supplementary motor area, and the putamen bilaterally confirmed that there were no group differences in activity. These results focus on tasks involving button presses and production of single nonwords, and therefore do not preclude inhibitory involvement related specifically to stuttering events. Our findings indicate that people who stutter do not show behavioural or neural differences in response inhibition, when making simple manual responses and producing fluent speech, contrary to predictions from the global inhibition hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.