Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800934›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

An fMRI study of initiation and inhibition of manual and spoken responses in people who stutter.

Charlotte E E Wiltshire, Jennifer Chesters, Saloni Krishnan, Gabriel J Cler, Máiréad P Healy, Kate E Watkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Verbal Response Inhibition in Adults Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte E E WiltshireDepartment of Psychology, School of Psychology and Sport Science, Bangor University, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-6642
Jennifer ChestersWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Saloni KrishnanWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-141X
Gabriel J ClerWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Máiréad P HealyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kate E WatkinsWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-482X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stuttering is characterised by difficulties initiating speech and frequent interruptions to the flow of speech. Neuroimaging studies of speech production in people who stutter consistently reveal greater activity of the right inferior frontal cortex, an area robustly implicated in stopping manual and spoken responses. This has been linked to an "overactive response suppression mechanism" in people who stutter. Here, we used fMRI to investigate neural differences related to response initiation and inhibition in people who stutter and matched controls (aged 19-45) during performance of the stop-signal task in both the manual and speech domains. We hypothesised there would be increased activity in an inhibitory network centred on the right inferior frontal cortex. Out-of-scanner behavioural testing revealed that people who stutter were slower than controls to respond to 'go' stimuli in both the manual and the speech domains, but the groups did not differ in their stop-signal reaction times in either domain. During the fMRI task, both groups activated the expected networks for the manual and speech tasks. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not observe differences in task-evoked activity between people who stutter and controls during either 'go' or 'stop' trials. Targeted region-of-interest analyses in the inferior frontal cortex, the supplementary motor area, and the putamen bilaterally confirmed that there were no group differences in activity. These results focus on tasks involving button presses and production of single nonwords, and therefore do not preclude inhibitory involvement related specifically to stuttering events. Our findings indicate that people who stutter do not show behavioural or neural differences in response inhibition, when making simple manual responses and producing fluent speech, contrary to predictions from the global inhibition hypothesis.

Indexed as

basal gangliadevelopmentalfunctional magnetic resonance imaginginhibitionprefrontal cortexpsychologicalspeechstuttering

Identifiers

PMID40800934
PMCPMC12330837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.