ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Non-parametric prediction of brain MRI microstructure using transfer learning.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be sensitive to tissue microstructural features and infer parameterized features by performing a voxel-wise fit of the signal to a biophysical model. However, biophysical models rely on simplified representations of brain tissue. Machine learning (ML) techniques may serve as a data-driven approach to optimize for microstructural feature extraction. Unfortunately, training an ML model for these applications requires a large database of paired specimen MRI and histology datasets, which is costly, cumbersome, and challenging to acquire. In this work, we present a novel approach allowing a reliable estimation of brain tissue microstructure using MRI as inputs, with a minimal amount of paired MRI-histology data. Our method involves pretraining a conditional normalizing flow model to predict the distribution of microstructural features. The model is trained on synthetic MRI data generated from unpaired histology and MRI physics, reducing the data requirement in future steps. The synthetic MRI generation data combines segmentation of a publicly available EM slice, feature extraction and MRI simulators. Subsequently, the model is fine-tuned using experimental MRI/Electron Microscopy (EM) data of nine excised mouse brains through transfer learning. This approach enables the prediction of non-parameterized joint distributions of g-ratio and axon diameters for a given voxel based on MRI input. Results show a close agreement between the distributions predicted by the network and the EM ground-truth histograms (mean Jensen-Shannon Distances of 0.24 and 0.23 on the test set, for axon diameter and g-ratios respectively, compared to distances of 0.18 and 0.18 of a direct fitting of a Gamma distribution to the ground truth). The approach also shows up to 4% decreased mean percent errors of the distributions compared to biophysical model fitting and increased prediction capabilities that are consistent with electron microscopy validation and previous biological studies. For example, g-ratio values predicted along the corpus callosum anterior-posterior axis show a significant difference for mice after myelin remodeling seizures are well established (p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.