ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Oscillatory signatures of monitoring and anticipatory strategies for probabilistic vs deterministic cues.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Inference Alterations in Psychosis Proneness Show Task-Dependent Signatures.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- A novel bias-free approach for robust perceptual threshold estimation.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Alpha frequency shapes perceptual sensitivity by modulating optimal phase likelihood.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Backward alpha band oscillations shape perceptual bias under probabilistic cues.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Preparing to act follows Bayesian inference rules.iScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perception is not exclusively determined by sensory input, being strongly shaped by expectations. Here, we manipulated target occurrence certainty-random (50%), probabilistic (63/75%), deterministic (100%)-to investigate how priors shape decision-making. Results revealed strong influence of expectations on decision-bias, with modulation increasing as priors attain predictive power. This influence was particularly evident in deterministic trials, where the prior's absolute validity heightened performance. Notably, individuals exhibited wide variability in predictive strategies: some exhibited strong prior-driven choice (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.