ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Functional ultrasound imaging and neuronal activity: How accurate is the spatiotemporal match?
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional ultrasound imaging in preclinical brain stimulation: from multimodal readouts to closed-loop neuromodulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Large Scale in vivo Acquisition, Segmentation and 3D Reconstruction of Cortical Vasculature usingNeuroinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, functional ultrasound (fUS) has risen as a critical tool in functional neuroimaging, leveraging hemodynamic changes to infer neural activity indirectly. Recent studies have established a strong correlation between neural spike rates (SR) and functional ultrasound signals. However, understanding their spatial distribution and variability across different brain areas is required to thoroughly interpret fUS signals. In this regard, we conducted simultaneous fUS imaging and Neuropixels recordings during stimulus-evoked activity in awake mice within three regions of the visual pathway. Our findings indicate that the temporal dynamics of fUS and SR signals are linearly correlated, providing an approximate calibration between the two signals. Conversely, the spatial correlation between the two signals remains consistent across all regions with a spread of approximately 300 micrometers. Finally, we introduce a model that integrates the spatial and temporal components of the fUS signal, allowing for a more accurate interpretation of fUS images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.