ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Comparative evaluation of image registration techniques in functional ultrasound imaging.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional ultrasound imaging (fUSI) is an emerging hemodynamic-based neuroimaging technique that combines high spatiotemporal resolution and sensitivity with extensive brain coverage, enabling a wide range of applications in preclinical brain research. Based on power Doppler imaging, fUSI measures changes in cerebral blood volume by detecting the back-scattered echoes from red blood cells moving within its field of view. Despite the significant contribution of fUSI technology to neuroscience research, its full potential is partly constrained by the challenge of accurately co-registering power Doppler vascular maps acquired across different sessions and/or animals to a single reference: an approach that could widen the scope of experimental paradigms and enable the utilization of advanced data analysis tools. This study aims to address this critical limitation by comparing eight image registration techniques to align 2D sagittal whole-brain fUSI datasets acquired from 82 anesthetized mice. The results showed a significant improvement in the alignment of fUSI images across all techniques. However, the non-rigid registration methods demonstrated either similar or superior performance in similarity metrics compared to rigid approaches, with the non-rigid version of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.