Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800896›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Open-source platforms to investigate analytical flexibility in neuroimaging.

Jacob Sanz-Robinson, Michelle Wang, Brent McPherson, Yohan Chatelain, David Kennedy, Tristan Glatard, Jean-Baptiste Poline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacob Sanz-RobinsonNeuroDataScience-ORIGAMI Lab, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michelle WangNeuroDataScience-ORIGAMI Lab, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Brent McPhersonNeuroDataScience-ORIGAMI Lab, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Yohan ChatelainDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
David KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Tristan GlatardKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jean-Baptiste PolineNeuroDataScience-ORIGAMI Lab, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-749X

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Yaroslav O Halchenko · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Large-scale meta-analysis of functional MRI dataR01MH096906 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alejandro De La Vega · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
Exposing the Deep Content of the Publication: Knowledge Extraction for Neuroimaging in Child PsychiatryR01MH083320 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRAZIER, JEAN A, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
The Neuroimaging Data Model: FAIR descriptors of Brain Initiative Imaging ExperimentsRF1MH120021 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KEATOR, DAVID BRYANT · 2019 to 2019
$944k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083320NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096906NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH120021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers in brain imaging have access to a multitude of analysis tools, many of which carry out the same or similar tasks but yield different results when applied to the same data. This analytical flexibility often undermines reproducibility and raises concerns about the robustness of neuroimaging studies. However, the array of software packages to investigate and address analytical flexibility is decentralized, scattered, and not well documented. Consequently, researchers often lack the necessary information and protocols to buttress the reliability of their findings across analytical tools. This review catalogs and describes software platforms (i.e., software or computational libraries) that can be used to address result variability arising from computational pipelines and environments and explores the use of computing platforms and neuroimaging pipeline frameworks in addressing this issue. This study offers guidance to the research community on accessing, understanding, and utilizing these platforms to address brain imaging analytical flexibility. Additionally, the article provides specific recommendations tailored to different user groups, considering the tools they intend to use with these platforms and their computational constraints.

Indexed as

analytical flexibilityneuroimagingopen sourcereproducibilitysoftware

Identifiers

PMID40800896
PMCPMC12330840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.