Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800895›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Combining video telemetry and wearable MEG for naturalistic imaging.

George C O'Neill, Robert A Seymour, Stephanie Mellor, Nicholas A Alexander, Tim M Tierney, Léa Bernachot, Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee, Meaghan E Spedden, Ryan C Timms, Daniel Bush and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Expanding the toolkit: OPMs for studying the developing brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  4. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. NovelImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Distorting anatomy to test MEG models and metrics.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

George C O'NeillDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-3768
Robert A SeymourDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephanie MellorDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas A AlexanderDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tim M TierneyDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Léa BernachotDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mansoureh Fahimi HnazaeeDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Meaghan E SpeddenDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ryan C TimmsDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel BushDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sven BestmannDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Gareth R BarnesDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have typically relied on rigorously controlled experimental paradigms to probe cognition, in which movement is restricted, primitive, an afterthought or merely used to indicate a subject's choice. Whilst powerful, these paradigms do not often resemble how we behave in everyday life, so a new generation of ecologically valid experiments are being developed. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measures neural activity by sensing extracranial magnetic fields. It has recently been transformed from a large, static imaging modality to a wearable method where participants can move freely. This makes wearable MEG systems a prime candidate for naturalistic experiments going forward. However, these experiments will also require novel methods to capture and integrate information about behaviour executed during neuroimaging, and it is not yet clear how this could be achieved. Here, we use video recordings of multi-limb dance moves, processed with open-source machine learning methods, to automatically identify time windows of interest in concurrent, wearable MEG data. In a first step, we compare a traditional, block-designed analysis of limb movements, where the times of interest are based on stimulus presentation, to an analysis pipeline based on hidden Markov model states derived from the video telemetry. Next, we show that it is possible to identify discrete modes of neuronal activity related to specific limbs and body posture by processing the participants' choreographed movement in a dancing paradigm. This demonstrates the potential of combining video telemetry with mobile magnetoencephalography and other legacy imaging methods for future studies of complex and naturalistic behaviours.

Indexed as

MEGnaturalistic neuroscienceOPMpose estimationtelemetry

Identifiers

PMID40800895
PMCPMC12319784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.