ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Behavioral and neural evidence for perceptual predictions in social interactions.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The representation of speech conversations in the human auditory cortex: role of social and semantic factors.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Disentangling dynamic information and temporal order processing of human action perception.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to predict others' behavior is crucial for social interactions. The goal of the present study was to test whether predictions are derived during observation of social interactions and how these predictions influence the whole-body emotional expressions of the agents are perceived. Using a novel paradigm, we induced social predictions in participants by presenting them with a short video of a social interaction in which a person approached another person and greeted him by touching the shoulder in either a neutral or an aggressive fashion. The video was followed by a still image showing a later stage in the interaction and we measured participants' behavioral and neural responses to the still image, which was either congruent or incongruent with the emotional valence of the touching. We varied the strength of the induced predictions by parametrically reducing the saliency of emotional cues in the video. Behaviorally, we found that reducing the emotional cues in the video led to a significant decrease in participants' ability to correctly judge the appropriateness of the emotional reaction in the image. At the neural level, EEG recordings revealed that observing an angry reaction elicited significantly larger N170 amplitudes than observing a neutral reaction. This emotion effect was only found in the high prediction condition (where the context in the preceding video was intact and clear), not in the mid and low prediction conditions. We further found that incongruent conditions elicited larger N300 amplitudes than congruent conditions only for the neutral images. Our findings provide evidence that viewing the initial stages of social interactions triggers predictions about their outcome in early cortical processing stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.