ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Functional brain activations correlated with association strength and prediction error during novel symbol-speech sound learning.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Reading Difficulties: Deviant Audiovisual Learning Dynamics and Network Connectivity in Children with Poor Reading Skills.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Unraveling individual differences in learning potential: A dynamic framework for the case of reading development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Neural and behavioural differences in multisensory statistical and reinforcement learning across development and task variants.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient learning of letters-speech sound associations results in the specialization of visual and audiovisual brain regions, which is crucial for the development of proficient reading skills. However, the brain dynamics underlying this learning process remain poorly understood, and the involvement of learning and performance monitoring networks remains underexplored. Here we applied two mutually dependent feedback learning tasks in which novel symbol-speech sound associations were learned by 39 healthy adults. We employed functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) along with a reinforcement learning drift diffusion model to characterize trial-by-trial learning in behavior and brain. The model-based analysis showed that posterior-occipital activations during stimulus processing were positively modulated by trial-wise learning, as indicated by the increase in association strength between audiovisual pairs. Prediction errors, describing the update mechanism to learn from feedback across trials, modulated activations in several mid-frontal, striatal, and cingulate regions. Both tasks yielded similar patterns of results, despite differences in their relative difficulty. This study elucidates the processes involved in audiovisual learning that contribute to rapid visual specialization within a single experimental session and delineates a set of coactivated regions involved in learning from feedback. Our paradigm provides a framework to advance our understanding of the neurobiology of learning and reading development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.