Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800874›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Are you talking to me? How the choice of speech register impacts listeners' hierarchical encoding of speech.

Giorgio Piazza, Sara Carta, Emily Y J Ip, Jose Pérez-Navarro, Marina Kalashnikova, Clara D Martin, Giovanni M Di Liberto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giorgio PiazzaBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-4499
Sara CartaSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, ADAPT Centre, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Emily Y J IpSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, ADAPT Centre, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jose Pérez-NavarroBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Marina KalashnikovaBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Clara D MartinBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Giovanni M Di LibertoSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, ADAPT Centre, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speakers accommodate their speech to meet the needs of their listeners, producing different speech registers. One such register is L2 Accommodation (L2A), which is the way native speakers address non-native listeners, typically characterized by features such as slow speech rate and phonetic exaggeration. Here, we investigated how register impacts the cortical encoding of speech at different levels of language integration. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that enhanced comprehension of L2A compared with Native Directed Speech (NDS) involves more than just a slower speech rate, influencing speech processing from acoustic to semantic levels. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded from Spanish native listeners, who were learning English (L2 learners), and English native listeners (L1 listeners) as they were presented with audio-stories. Speech was presented in English in three different speech registers: L2A, NDS, and a control register (Slow-NDS) which is a slowed down version of NDS. We measured the cortical encoding of acoustic, phonological, and semantic information with a multivariate temporal response function analysis (TRF) on the EEG signals. We found that L2A promoted L2 learners' cortical encoding at all the levels of speech and language processing considered. First, L2A led to a more pronounced encoding of the speech envelope. Second, phonological encoding was more refined when listening to L2A, with phoneme perception getting closer to that of L1 listeners. Finally, L2A also enhanced the TRF-N400, a neural signature of semantic integration. Conversely, L2A impacted acoustic but not linguistic speech encoding in L1 listeners. In contrast, slow-NDS altered the cortical encoding of sound acoustics in L1 listeners but did not impact semantic or phonological encoding. Taken together, these results support our hypothesis that L2A accommodates speech processing in L2 listeners beyond what can be achieved by simply speaking slowly, impacting the cortical encoding of sound and language at different abstraction levels. In turn, this study provides objective metrics that are sensitive to the impact of register on the hierarchical encoding of speech, which could be extended to other registers and cohorts.

Indexed as

cortical encodingEEGL2 perceptionspeech accommodationspeech registerTRF

Identifiers

PMID40800874
PMCPMC12319891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.