ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Reliability of triggering the stop process is related to prefrontal-subthalamic hyperdirect pathway recruitment.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model-based analysis of stop-signal data reveals robust neural and clinical correlates of evidence accumulation but not inhibition.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The estimated latency of the unobservable stop response, the so-called stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), has been the established measure of performance in the stop-signal task. While it is currently debated whether SSRT is a suitable marker of inhibition performance, other markers such as the reliability of triggering the stop process ("stop trigger failures") are coming into focus. In the present study, we elucidated the mechanisms associated with trigger failures using a model-based neuroscience approach by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging for the first time. To this end, we used a large, open-access fMRI data set to investigate the relationship between the probability of trigger failures and fMRI signal change in a stop-signal task in healthy adults (n = 113). Stop trigger failures were associated with less activity in the substantia nigra during unsuccessful stopping and with less activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) region during successful inhibition. Although stop trigger failures strongly correlated with SSRT, we found only little evidence for a correlation between SSRT and stopping-related fMRI signal. Thus, in particular, the reliability of the stop process and not its estimated latency depends on the recruitment of key nodes within the prefrontal-subthalamic hyperdirect pathway. More specifically, stop trigger failures may be linked to inadequate substantia nigra innervation at the neural network level. As current evidence suggests that the hyperdirect pathway is engaged by the processing of salient stimuli, deficiencies in assessing the relevance of the stop signal may represent a phenotype associated with a propensity to trigger the stop process unreliably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.