ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Source reconstruction without an MRI using optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing Pediatric Neurophysiology With Magnetoencephalography.Psychophysiology · 2026Review
- Assessing the stability of evoked, induced, and passive MEG responses for repeat testing with optically pumped magnetometers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mapping neural signatures of face processing in young children: an OPM-MEG study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Measuring the neurodevelopmental trajectory of excitatory-inhibitory balance via visual gamma oscillations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Data-driven head model individualization from digitized electrode positions or photogrammetry improves M/EEG source localization accuracy.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Source modelling in magnetoencephalography (MEG) infers the spatial origins of electrophysiological signals in the brain. Typically, this requires an anatomical MRI scan of the subject's head, from which models of the magnetic fields generated by the brain (the forward model) are derived. Wearable MEG-based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs)-enables MEG measurement from participants who struggle to cope with conventional scanning environments (e.g., children), enabling study of novel cohorts. However, its value is limited if an MRI scan is still required for source modelling. Here we describe a method of warping template MRIs to 3D structured-light scans of the head, to generate "pseudo-MRIs". We apply our method to data from 20 participants during a sensory task, measuring induced (beta band) responses and whole-brain functional connectivity. Results show that the group average locations of peak task-induced beta modulation were separated by 2.75 mm, when comparing real- and pseudo-MRI approaches. Group averaged time-frequency spectra were also highly correlated (Pearson correlation 0.99) as were functional connectome matrices (0.87) and global connectivity (0.98). In sum, our results demonstrate that source-localised OPM-MEG data, modelled with and without an individual MRI scan, can be comparable. While individual MRI scans remain the "gold standard" for OPM-MEG modelling, our method will be useful for future studies where MRI data capture is challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.