ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Imaging the developing brain with near-infrared spectroscopy in cochlear implanted children.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of Cortical Responses in Distinct Clinical Populations.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Shape of the hemodynamic response function in deaf infants eligible for cochlear implantation.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Objective Audiometry: A Scoping Review and Clinical Perspectives.Audiology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) have revolutionized how we treat hearing impairment. Despite major technological and clinical advances, some CI children's language abilities remain below those of their age-matched peers, and there is still considerable individual variability in final outcomes. One important factor underlying this may be individual differences in brain plasticity before and after implantation. However, the neural changes induced in the developing brain by deafness, language deprivation, and the restoration of hearing due to implantation are little understood, in part because the methodological options available are limited. Recently, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has emerged as a fully CI-compatible, infant-friendly, non-invasive, and inexpensive technique that holds the promise of shedding light on the neural mechanisms accompanying deafness and CI use. Here, we review the existing fNIRS studies with developmental populations. We then discuss the methodological challenges that using fNIRS with CI children raise. Finally, we describe open questions that fNIRS has the potential to answer. We conclude that fNIRS is a powerful tool to investigate the neural mechanisms and changes brought about by deafness and the subsequent restoration of hearing with CI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.