ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Word-selective EEG/MEG responses in the English language obtained with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tracking novel visual word learning via different methods with an original FPVS-EEG approach.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) allows the objective measurement of brain responses of human word discrimination (i.e., reproducible word-category-selective responses) with a high signal-to-noise ratio. This approach has been successfully employed over the last decade in a number of scalp electroencephalography (EEG) studies. Three important advances for research on word-selective brain responses were achieved in the present study: (1) we extend previous evidence of robust word-category-selective responses to the English language, (2) report results for combined EEG and MEG signals, and (3) source estimation results. English words were presented periodically (2 Hz) among different types of letter strings (10 Hz; consonant strings, non-words, pseudo-words) while recording simultaneous EEG and MEG in 25 participants who performed a simple non-linguistic colour detection task. Data were analysed in sensor and in source space. With only 4 minutes of stimulation, we observed a robust word discrimination response in each condition, even when words were embedded in sequences of word-like pseudo-words. This response was larger in non-words and largest in consonant strings. We observed left-lateralised responses in all conditions in the majority of our participants. Cluster-based permutation tests revealed that these responses were left-lateralised in sensor as well as in source space, with peaks in left posterior regions. Our results demonstrate that the FPVS approach can elicit robust English word discrimination responses in EEG and MEG within only a few minutes of recording time. Together with source estimation, this can provide novel insights into the neural basis of visual word recognition in healthy and clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.