ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using breath-hold BOLD-fMRI: Comparison of signal models combined with voxelwise lag optimization.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiration Can Trigger Cerebrovascular Reactivity: A Novel Method to Quantify Cerebrovascular Resistance Dynamics Using Real-Time Phase-Contrast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Breath-Hold Functional MRI in Patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy: Which Time Period to Analyze?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Iterative delay correction improves breath-hold cerebrovascular reactivity mapping in clinical populations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- MRI mapping of hemodynamics in the human spinal cord.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) can be mapped noninvasively using blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fMRI during a breath-hold (BH) task. Previous studies showed that the BH BOLD response is best modeled as the convolution of the partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PetCO2) with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF). However, previous model comparisons employed a global bulk time lag, which is now well accepted to provide only a rough approximation of the heterogeneous distribution of response latencies across the brain. Here, we investigate the best modeling approach for mapping CVR based on BH BOLD-fMRI data, when using a lagged general linear model approach for voxelwise lag optimization. In a group of 14 healthy participants, we compared two types of regressors (PetCO2 and Block), and three convolution models (no convolution; convolution with a single gamma HRF; and convolution with a double gamma HRF), as well as a range of HRF delays and dispersions (for models with convolution). Convolution with a single gamma HRF yielded the greatest CVR values in PetCO2 models, while a double gamma HRF performed better for block models. Although PetCO2-based regressors generally outperformed block-based regressors, as expected, the latter may be an appropriate alternative in cases of poor CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.