ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Task demands shape network interactions during reading and visual form processing.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Common pitfalls during model specification in psychophysiological interaction analysis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current theories of reading, based largely on lesion studies, propose that left fusiform gyrus (FusG) is a crucial hub linking visual inputs into the perisylvian language system. However, FusG is also involved in visual form processing more generally, raising the question of whether its engagement with language cortex and other relevant brain regions changes according to task demands, and whether this flexibility is linked to reading proficiency. To answer these questions, we exploit a large, pre-existing, reading-based language fMRI dataset, in which pseudoword rhyming and visuospatial form processing are contrasted. We studied 201 adults from the Australian Epilepsy Project, including 94 with a history of seizures. A comparable pattern of activation and connectivity was observed in those with or without a history of seizures: The rhyming task produced robust activation in left FusG and perisylvian language areas. As predicted, connectivity from FusG to the left language cortex increased significantly during rhyming. We also observed significant increases in connectivity from the same FusG seed to the right parietal cortex during visuospatial form processing. The seizure group comprised a broader range of reading proficiency, and in this group better readers showed stronger increases in FusG connectivity to the left middle frontal gyrus and the medial prefrontal cortex. This suggests that visual text processing and articulatory sequencing are less tightly integrated in poor readers. By demonstrating how FusG connectivity shifts between language and visuospatial networks, our results provide new evidence that adaptive functional reorganisation is beneficial for cognitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.