Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800817›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Challenging the status quo: A guide to open and reproducible neuroimaging for early career researchers.

Nikhil Bhagwat, Sebastian Urchs, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Yu-Fang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikhil BhagwatMontreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-7141
Sebastian UrchsMontreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-8579
Jean-Baptiste PolineMontreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-749X
Yu-Fang YangDivision of Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-6020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, neuroimaging research has seen a proliferation of open tools, platforms, and standards aimed at addressing the reproducibility crisis in the field. The growing awareness on this topic is bringing about a cultural shift in the scientific community, especially among early career researchers (ECRs). As members of this demographic, we can attest to the fact that the adoption of these new tools and practices remains a challenge. This work aims to provide a practical guide for ECRs to navigate the expanding landscape of the open-science resources and make proactive decisions for their research workflows dealing with large, multiple datasets. From our own experience, we describe the common hurdles faced in typical research workflow and provide a set of solutions that could serve as a starting point for researchers looking for practical tools and protocols. Through a hypothetical scenario, we walk through the steps of curating, processing, harmonizing, and publishing a dataset while describing the tools and practices helpful for adopting FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) principles. We hope this guide can help ECRs and others to simplify their daily research life as we all strive towards more open, reproducible, and translational neuroscience research.

Indexed as

early career researchersEEGMRIneuroimagingneuroinformaticsopen sciencereproducible research

Identifiers

PMID40800817
PMCPMC12319985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.