Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800806›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Evaluating lesion-specific preprocessing pipelines for rs-fMRI in stroke patients: Impact on functional connectivity and behavioral prediction.

Alix Lamouroux, Julie Coloigner, Pierre Maurel, Nicolas Farrugia, Giulia Lioi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alix LamourouxIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285 F-29238, Brest, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2046-3703
Julie ColoignerUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-8015
Pierre MaurelUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, Rennes, France.
Nicolas FarrugiaIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285 F-29238, Brest, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7160-0431
Giulia LioiIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285 F-29238, Brest, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-9814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is essential for studying brain function and connectivity. Resting-state fMRI, which captures spontaneous brain activity without task requirements, is particularly suited for individuals with post-stroke impairments. However, the inherent noise and artifacts in fMRI signals can compromise analysis accuracy, especially in stroke patients with complex neurological conditions. Currently, there is no consensus on the best preprocessing approach for stroke fMRI data. In this study, we design and evaluate three preprocessing pipelines: a standard pipeline, an enhanced pipeline that accounts for lesions when computing tissue masks, and a stroke-specific pipeline that incorporates independent component analysis to address lesion-driven artifacts. These pipelines are assessed for their effectiveness in reducing spurious connectivity and improving the prediction of behavioral outcomes on a large stroke dataset. Using metrics such as connectivity mean strength and functional connectivity contrast, our results indicate that the stroke-specific pipeline significantly reduces spurious connectivity without impacting behavioral predictions. These findings underscore the need for tailored preprocessing strategies in stroke fMRI research to enhance the reliability and accuracy of connectivity measures. In addition, we make the stroke-specific pipeline accessible by designing an open-source tool (fMRIStroke), in order to ensure replicability of our results and to contribute to best practices.

Indexed as

fMRI preprocessingfunctional connectivitystroke

Identifiers

PMID40800806
PMCPMC12320005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.