Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800801›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Magnitude processing and integration entail perceptual processes independent from the task.

Irene Togoli, Olivier Collignon, Domenica Bueti, Michele Fornaciai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene TogoliInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY) et en Neurosciences (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Olivier CollignonInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY) et en Neurosciences (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Domenica BuetiNeuroscience Department, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Michele FornaciaiInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY) et en Neurosciences (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3350-9439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude dimensions of visual stimuli, such as their numerosity, duration, and size, are intrinsically linked, leading to mutual interactions across them. However, it remains debated whether such interactions, or "magnitude integration" effects, arise from perceptual processes that are independent from the task performed, or whether they arise from high-level decision-making processes. We address this question with two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments in which participants watched a series of dot-array stimuli modulated in numerosity, duration, and item size, in two separate conditions. In the "magnitude task" condition, participants judged either the numerosity, duration, or size of each stimulus. In the "contrast task" condition, instead, a separate group of participants performed a contrast oddball task, never attending or judging the magnitude of the stimuli. The results of the magnitude task first show robust integration effects across the three dimensions. Then, we compare the neural responses to magnitude across the two task conditions. This comparison shows very similar brain responses irrespective of the task, within a series of latency windows whereby the modulation of response amplitude can predict the behavioral magnitude integration effect (~150 and ~250 ms post-onset for numerosity and size; ~300 ms post-offset for the effect of duration). To better assess the similarity of brain responses to magnitude irrespective of the task, we use a cross-condition multivariate decoding analysis. This analysis demonstrates that brain responses in the magnitude task can predict the responses in the contrast task, at multiple latencies starting from early processing stages (~120 ms). These results suggest that magnitude processing and integration likely involve perceptual processes that are engaged irrespective of the task, thus independently from decision making, although the effect of duration on other magnitudes may also involve post-perceptual processes such as working memory.

Indexed as

EEGmagnitude integrationmagnitude perceptionnumerosity perceptionsize perceptiontime perception

Identifiers

PMID40800801
PMCPMC12319895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.