Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800799›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Opponent visuospatial coding structures responses during memory recall and visual perception in medial parietal cortex.

Catriona L Scrivener, Edward H Silson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catriona L ScrivenerDepartment of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-5587
Edward H SilsonDepartment of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-7423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms linking perceptual and memory representations in the brain are not yet fully understood. In the early visual cortex, perception and memory are known to share similar neural representations, but how they interact beyond early visual cortex is less clear. Recent work identified that scene-perception and scene-memory areas on the lateral and ventral surfaces of the brain are linked via a shared but opponent visuospatial coding scheme, with spatially specific visual responses in the absence of traditionally defined retinotopic maps. This shared visuospatial coding may provide a framework for perceptual-memory interactions. Here, we test whether the pattern of visuospatial coding within category-selective memory areas of the medial parietal cortex structures responses during memory recall and visual perception. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we observe signatures of visuospatial coding in the form of population receptive fields (pRFs) with both positive and negative response profiles within medial parietal cortex. Crucially, the more dissimilar the timeseries of a pair of positive/negative pRFs within a region, the more dissimilar their responses during both memory recall and visual perception. These are tasks that place very different demands on these regions: internally oriented memory recall versus externally oriented visual perception. These data extend recent work to suggest that the interplay between pRFs with opponent visuospatial coding may play a vital role in integrating information across different representational spaces.

Indexed as

medial parietal cortexperceptionrecallvisuospatial coding

Identifiers

PMID40800799
PMCPMC12319830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.