Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800798›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Multiscale comparative connectomics.

Vivek Gopalakrishnan, Jaewon Chung, Eric Bridgeford, Benjamin D Pedigo, Jesús Arroyo, Lucy Upchurch, G Allan Johnson, Nian Wang, Youngser Park, Carey E Priebe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vivek GopalakrishnanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-8526
Jaewon ChungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Eric BridgefordDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Benjamin D PedigoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jesús ArroyoDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Lucy UpchurchCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
G Allan JohnsonCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Nian WangDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Youngser ParkCenter for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Carey E PriebeCenter for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Joshua T VogelsteinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The connectome, a map of the structural and/or functional connections in the brain, provides a complex representation of the neurobiological phenotypes on which it supervenes. This information-rich data modality has the potential to transform our understanding of the relationship between patterns in brain connectivity and neurological processes, disorders, and diseases. However, existing computational techniques used to analyze connectomes are often insufficient for interrogating multi-subject connectomics datasets: many current methods are either solely designed to analyze single connectomes or leverage heuristic graph statistics that are unable to capture the complete topology of multiscale connections between brain regions. To enable more rigorous connectomics analysis, we introduce a set of robust and interpretable statistical hypothesis tests motivated by recent theoretical advances in random graph models. These tests facilitate simultaneous analysis of multiple connectomes across different scales of network topology, enabling the robust and reproducible discovery of hierarchical brain structures that vary in relation to phenotypic profiles. In addition to explaining the theoretical foundations and guarantees of our algorithms, we demonstrate their superiority over current state-of-the-art connectomics methods through extensive simulation studies and real-data experiments. Using a set of high-resolution connectomes obtained from genetically distinct mouse strains (including the BTBR mouse-a standard model of autism-and three behavioral wild-types), we illustrate how our methods successfully uncover latent information in multi-subject connectomics data and yield valuable insights into the connective correlates of neurological phenotypes that other methods do not capture. The data and code necessary to reproduce the analyses, simulations, and figures presented in this work are available athttps://github.com/neurodata/MCC.

Indexed as

network neurosciencerandom graph modelsstatistical connectomics

Identifiers

PMID40800798
PMCPMC12319836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.