Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800790›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

The neural basis of face pareidolia with human intracerebral recordings.

Begüm Cerrahoğlu, Corentin Jacques, Diane Rekow, Jacques Jonas, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois, Stephanie Caharel, Arnaud Leleu, Bruno Rossion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Begüm CerrahoğluUniversité de Lorraine, InterPsy, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-3588
Corentin JacquesUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8917-4346
Diane RekowBiological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-9998
Jacques JonasUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1053-0748
Sophie Colnat-CoulboisUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Service de Neurologie, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-857X
Stephanie CaharelUniversité de Lorraine, InterPsy, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-3462
Arnaud LeleuDevelopment of Olfactory Communication and Cognition Lab, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Université Bourgogne Europe, CNRS, INRAe, Institut Agro, Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-8183
Bruno RossionUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-3935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of a meaningful facial pattern on a nebulous stimulus-face pareidolia-is a typical human experience. Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies have generally shown similarities in the spatio-temporal responses to typical faces and objects eliciting face pareidolia, that is, facelike objects. However, the extent to which facelike objects engage the same neural basis as human faces remains unclear. To address this issue, we used direct measures of brain activity from intracerebral electrodes implanted in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex (VOTC) of a large group of patients (n = 44). Face selectivity was determined by contrasting a large set of naturalistic face or facelike object images with non-face object categories. High signal-to-noise ratio face-selective and facelike object-selective responses were objectively identified and quantified with frequency tagging and compared in space and time throughout the VOTC. Selective activity to facelike objects was found in all key regions of the human cortical face network, extending to the previously unexplored anterior temporal lobe (ATL). Although category-selective activity was markedly reduced for facelike objects compared with human faces, consistent with previous findings, 89% of facelike object-selective contacts spatially overlapped with human face-selective contacts, while the remaining spatially scattered contacts recorded negligible responses. Furthermore, the amplitude of the two face-selective neural signals showed high correlations across regions, recording contacts and time courses as well as concurrent early onset, challenging the view that facelike objects are interpreted as faces through feedback from higher order brain regions. Together, our findings demonstrate that the pareidolic perception of face in facelike objects engages the same ventro-temporal neural circuitry, with the same temporal dynamics, as human faces.

Indexed as

facelike objectsface pareidoliafrequency taggingintracerebral recordingsventral occipito-temporal cortex

Identifiers

PMID40800790
PMCPMC12319871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.