ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Situ Calibration Method for an MGT Detection System Based on Helmholtz Coils.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accurate OPM-MEG Co-Registration via Magnetic Dipole-Based Sensor Localization with Rigid Coil Structures and Optical Direction Constraints.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Sensor Localization and Orientation Method for OPM-MEG Based on Rigid Coil Structures and Magnetic Dipole Fitting Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pushing the boundaries of MEG based on optically pumped magnetometers towards early human life.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Towards a 384-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Channel gain calibrated signal space projection using variational Bayesian estimation for optically pumped magnetometers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are compact and lightweight sensors that can measure magnetic fields generated by current flow in neuronal assemblies in the brain. Such sensors enable construction of magnetoencephalography (MEG) instrumentation, with significant advantages over conventional MEG devices, including adaptability to head size, enhanced movement tolerance, lower complexity, and improved data quality. However, realising the potential of OPMs depends on our ability to perform system calibration-which means finding sensor locations, orientations, and the relationship between the sensor output and magnetic field (termed sensor gain). Such calibration is complex in OPM-MEG since, for example, OPM placement can change from subject to subject (unlike in conventional MEG where sensor locations/orientations are fixed). Here, we present two methods for calibration, both based on generating well-characterised magnetic fields across a sensor array. Our first device (the HALO) is a head mounted system that generates dipole-like fields from a set of coils. Our second (the matrix coil (MC)) generates fields using coils embedded in the walls of a magnetically shielded room. Our results show that both methods offer an accurate means to calibrate an OPM array (e.g., sensor locations within 2 mm of the ground truth) and that the calibrations produced by the two methods agree strongly with each other: reconstructed positions, orientations, and gains differ on average by 2.0 mm; 1.2° and 1.3% between HALO and MC. When applied to data from human MEG experiments, both methods offer improved signal-to-noise ratio after beamforming, suggesting that they give calibration parameters closer to the ground truth than presumed physical sensor coordinates and orientations. Both techniques are practical and easy to integrate into real-world MEG applications. This advances the field significantly closer to the routine use of OPMs for MEG recording.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.