ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Unaware processing of words activates experience-derived information in conceptual-semantic brain networks.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Embodied Cognition of Manipulative Actions: Subliminal Grasping Semantics Enhance Using-Action Recognition.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recognition of manipulable objects results from the encoding of sensory input in combination with predictive decoding of experience-derived visuomotor information stored in conceptual-semantic representations. This grounded interpretative processing was previously found to subsist even under unaware perception of manipulable object pictures. In this fMRI study, we first aimed to extend this finding by testing whether experientially grounded visuomotor representations are unawarely recruited when manipulable objects are not visually depicted, but only referred to by words presented subliminally through continuous flash suppression. Second, we assessed the generalizability of decoding experience-derived conceptual information to other semantic categories, by extending our investigation to subliminally presented emotion words and testing for unaware recruitment of grounded emotion representations in the limbic system. Univariate analysis of data sampled from 21 human participants (14 females) showed that manipulable object words selectively activated a left-lateralized visuomotor network, both when words were presented below perceptual threshold and when participants subjectively reported lack of stimulus awareness. Emotion words selectively engaged the bilateral limbic network, although univariate analysis did not provide evidence for its recruitment under subliminal perceptual conditions. In turn, multivariate pattern analysis showed that neural codes associated with both manipulable object and emotion words could be decoded even in the absence of perceptual awareness. These findings suggest that the brain automatically engages in conceptual-semantic decoding of experience-derived information not only when circumstances require to interact with manipulable objects and emotions, but also when these referents are dislocated in time and space and only referred to by words.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.