ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Temporal variability of brain-behavior relationships in fine-scale dynamics of edge time series.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dual interpretation of edge time series: Time-varying connectivity versus statistical interaction.iScience · 2026Article
- Connectome-based predictive modeling of concurrent and longitudinal substance use vulnerability in adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cognition, but not affect, rests upon a segregated intrinsic network architecture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Regional activity and interregional functional connectivity uniquely contribute to social cognitive judgments during movie-watching.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Mapping high-amplitude fMRI edge time series events across space and time.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most work on functional connectivity (FC) in neuroimaging data prefers longer scan sessions or greater subject count to improve reliability of brain-behavior relationships or predictive models. Here, we investigate whether systematically isolating moments in time can improve brain-behavior relationships and outperform full scan data. We assess how behavioral relationships vary over time points that are less visible in full FC based on co-fluctuation amplitude. Additionally, we perform optimizations using a temporal filtering strategy to identify time points that improve brain-behavior relationships. Analyses were performed on resting-state fMRI data of 352 healthy subjects from the Human Connectome Project and across 58 different behavioral measures. Templates were created to select time points with similar patterns of brain activity and optimized for each behavior to maximize brain-behavior relationships from reconstructed functional networks. With 10% of scan data, optimized templates of select behavioral measures achieved greater strength of brain-behavior correlations and greater transfer of behavioral associations between groups of subjects than full FC across multiple cross-validation splits of the dataset. Therefore, selectively filtering time points may allow for development of more targeted FC analyses and increased understanding of how specific moments in time contribute to behavioral prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.