ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Fast and reliable quantitative measures of white matter development with magnetic resonance fingerprinting.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully 3D Unrolled Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Reconstruction via Staged Pretraining and Implicit Gridding.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- In Vivo Meso-Scale Whole-Brain Quantitative Imaging With Tailored MRF on the NexGen 7T Scanner.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- OPTIKS: Optimized Gradient Properties Through Timing in k-Space.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- The balance between stability and plasticity of the visual word form area in dyslexia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Approximating R1 and R2: A Quantitative Approach to Clinical Weighted MRI.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental cognitive neuroscience aims to shed light on evolving relationshipsbetween brain structure and cognitive development. To this end, quantitativemethods that reliably measure individual differences in brain tissue propertiesare fundamental. Standard qualitative MRI sequences are influenced by scanparameters and hardware-related biases, and also lack physical units, making theanalysis of individual differences problematic. In contrast, quantitative MRIcan measure physical properties of the tissue but with the cost of long scandurations and sensitivity to motion. This poses a critical limitation forstudying young children. Here, we examine the reliability of an efficientquantitative multiparameter mapping method-magnetic resonancefingerprinting (MRF)-in children scanned longitudinally. We focus on T1values in white matter, since quantitative T1 values are known to primarilyreflect myelin content, a key factor in brain development. Forty-nine childrenaged 8-13 years (mean 10.3 years ± 1.4) completed 2 scanningsessions 2-4 months apart. In each session, two 2-min 3D-MRF scans at 1mm isotropic resolution were collected to evaluate the effect of scan durationon image quality and scan-rescan reliability. A separate calibration scanwas used to measure B0 inhomogeneity and correct for bias. We examined theimpact of scan time and B0 inhomogeneity correction on scan-rescanreliability of values in white matter, by comparing single 2-min and combinedtwo 2-min scans, with and without B0 correction. Whole-brain voxel-basedreliability analysis showed that combining two 2-min MRF scans improvedreliability (Pearson's r = 0.87) compared with a single 2-min scan(r = 0.84), while B0 correction had no effect on reliability in whitematter (r = 0.86 and 0.83 4- vs. 2-min). Using diffusion tractography, wesegmented major white matter fiber tracts and examined the profiles ofMRF-derived T1 values along each tract. We found that T1 values from MRF showedsimilar or greater reliability compared with diffusion parameters. Lastly, wefound that R1 (1/T1) values in multiple white matter tracts were significantlycorrelated with age. In sum, MRF-derived T1 values were highly reliable in alongitudinal sample of children and replicated known age effects. Reliability inwhite matter was improved by longer scan duration but was not affected by B0correction, making it a quick and straightforward scan to collect. We proposethat MRF provides a promising avenue for acquiring quantitative brain metrics inchildren and patient populations where scan time and motion are of particularconcern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.