Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800772›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Inferring laminar origins of MEG signals with optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs): A simulation study.

Saskia Helbling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saskia HelblingErnst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explore the potential of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) to non-invasively infer the laminar origins of neural activity. OPM sensors can be positioned closer to the scalp than conventional cryogenic magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensors, opening an avenue to higher spatial resolution when combined with high-precision source space modelling. By simulating the forward model projection of single dipole sources at deep and superficial cortical surfaces onto OPM sensor arrays with varying sensor densities and measurement axes, and employing sparse source reconstruction approaches, we find that laminar inference with OPM arrays is possible at relatively low sensor counts under moderate-to-high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). We observe improvements in laminar inference with increasing spatial sampling densities and measurement axes and demonstrate the advantage of placing the sensors closer to the scalp for inferring the laminar origins of cortical sources. However, challenges remain, such as biases towards both the superficial and deep surfaces at very low SNRs and a notable bias towards the deep surface when combining empirical Bayesian beamformer (EBB) source reconstruction with a whole-brain analysis. Adequate SNR through appropriate trial numbers and shielding, as well as precise co-registration, is crucial for reliable laminar inference with OPMs.

Indexed as

laminar inferencemagnetoencephalographyoptically pumped magnetometerssimulation studysource reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID40800772
PMCPMC12319968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.