ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Automated speech artefact removal from MEG data utilizing facial gestures and mutual information.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estimating Mutual Information and Pearson Correlation on Neural Evoked Responses.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to speak is one of the most crucial human skills, motivating neuroscientific studies of speech production and speech-related neural dynamics. Increased knowledge in this area allows, for example, for development of rehabilitation protocols for language-related disorders. While our understanding of speech-related neural processes has been greatly enhanced owing to non-invasive neuroimaging techniques, the interpretations have been limited by speech artefacts caused by the activation of facial muscles that mask important language-related information. Despite earlier approaches applying independent component analysis (ICA), the artefact removal process continues to be time consuming, poorly replicable, and affected by inconsistencies between different observers, typically requiring manual selection of artefactual components. The artefact component selection criteria have been variable, leading to non-standardized speech artefact removal processes. To address these issues, we propose here a pipeline for automated speech artefact removal from magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. We developed an ICA-based speech artefact removal routine by utilizing electromyography (EMG) data measured from facial muscles during a facial gesture task for isolating the speech-induced artefacts. Additionally, we used mutual information (MI) as a similarity measure between the EMG signals and the ICA-decomposed MEG to provide a feasible way to identify the artefactual components. Our approach efficiently and in an automated manner removed speech artefacts from MEG data. The method can be feasibly applied to improve the understanding of speech-related cortical dynamics, while transparently evaluating the removed and preserved MEG activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.