Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800764›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

The Voxelwise Encoding Model framework: A tutorial introduction to fitting encoding models to fMRI data.

Tom Dupré la Tour, Matteo Visconti di Oleggio Castello, Jack L Gallant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual semantic tuning across the cortex shifts between tasks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid cortical mapping with cross-participant encoding models.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Individual differences shape conceptual representation in the brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tom Dupré la TourHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Matteo Visconti di Oleggio CastelloHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Jack L GallantHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-1054

Funding

Attention and Semantic Evaluation as Predictors of Empathy in Healthy Aging and Frontotemporal DementiaRF1AG029577 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RANKIN, KATHERINE P · 2019 to 2019
$4.0M
Visual Representation and AttentionR01EY019684 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GALLANT, JACK L · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019684NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG029577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Voxelwise Encoding Model framework (VEM) is a powerful approach for functional brain mapping. In the VEM framework, features are extracted from the stimulus (or task) and used in an encoding model to predict brain activity. If the encoding model is able to predict brain activity in some part of the brain, then one may conclude that some information represented in the features is also encoded in the brain. In VEM, a separate encoding model is fitted on each spatial sample (i.e., each voxel). VEM has many benefits compared to other methods for analyzing and modeling neuroimaging data. Most importantly, VEM can use large numbers of features simultaneously, which enables the analysis of complex naturalistic stimuli and tasks. Therefore, VEM can produce high-dimensional functional maps that reflect the selectivity of each voxel to large numbers of features. Moreover, because model performance is estimated on a separate test dataset not used during fitting, VEM minimizes overfitting and inflated Type I error confounds that plague other approaches, and the results of VEM generalize to new subjects and new stimuli. Despite these benefits, VEM is still not widely used in neuroimaging, partly because no tutorials on this method are available currently. To demystify the VEM framework and ease its dissemination, this paper presents a series of hands-on tutorials accessible to novice practitioners. The VEM tutorials are based on free open-source tools and public datasets, and reproduce the analysis presented in previously published work.

Indexed as

fMRI data analysisfunctional brain mappingnaturalistic stimulipredictive modelingridge regressionvoxelwise encoding models

Identifiers

PMID40800764
PMCPMC12319962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.