Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800763›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Sensory modality of initiation cues modulates action goal-relevant neural representations.

Nicholas Kreter, Neil M Dundon, Jolinda Smith, Michelle Marneweck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas KreterDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1567-6287
Neil M DundonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-1775
Jolinda SmithDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3849-745X
Michelle MarneweckDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-5956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to produce goal-directed movement relies on the integration of diverse sensory cues which contribute to goal subtasks, such as trajectory planning and initiation. To achieve these subtasks, the central nervous system must flexibly weight sensory contributions depending on task context, and sensory cues from one modality may contribute to multiple subtasks. Neural representations of goal-relevant features are flexible to a variety of sensory contexts. It remains less clear how neural representations of goal-relevant features are modulated when initiation-relevant features rely on sensory cues from overlapping sensory modalities. We used Bayesian pattern component modeling of fMRI data during a delayed reach task with either visual or audiovisual go-cues to explore whether neural representations of goal-related features in sensorimotor areas are modulated by changes to initiation-relevant sensory information. We found that representations of gaze direction and target direction in the primary sensory areas, motor areas, and posterior parietal cortex varied depending on whether a reach was cued with a visual or audiovisual go-cue. These findings suggest that the central nervous system flexibly delegates the tasks of 'where' to move and 'when' to move based on available sensory context, even if initiation-relevant stimuli provide no additional information about target location.

Indexed as

fMRImultisensoryneural representationsreaching

Identifiers

PMID40800763
PMCPMC12319815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.