ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Action observation and imitation: Corticospinal responses and hemispheric dominance.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aberrant gesture use in autism spectrum disorders is unrelated to motor abnormalities.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Therapeutic effect of mirror visual feedback therapy on neuropathic pain in patients with total brachial plexus injuries.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The response of the motor neuron system to the observation of lateralized movements and expectation mismatches remains elusive. We investigated how observation of hand movement modulates corticospinal excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials to single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Twenty-seven adults watched a series of egocentric video recordings of hands, with one hand either squeezing a foam ball as expected or both hands remaining stationary. Task conditions comprised observation-only and observation with synchronous imitation of the depicted motor action. Single TMS pulses were delivered to the motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand at the video frame of maximal hand closure for squeeze videos and randomly for no-squeeze videos (in both observation-only or observation with synchronous imitation). We analyzed MEPs, from the First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI) muscle of the dominant hand. Observation alone (absence of motor intention) did not enhance corticospinal excitability; however, when paired with imitation (presence of motor intention), it tended to increase MEP amplitudes, regardless of the attended side (dominant or non-dominant) or depicted action (squeeze or not). Among conditions in which the dominant hand remained stationary, MEP amplitudes were elevated (p = 0.004) in observation with imitation of non-dominant hand squeezing, suggesting hemispheric dominance in coordinating motor actions. Additionally, MEP latencies tended to decrease during synchronous imitation of squeeze videos. Our findings support the consideration of observation with synchronous imitation as a task for brain state-dependent brain stimulation protocols for optimizing neuromotor recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.